<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KEE RIKE EEE!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamesangus.ucantblamem.com/work/kee-rike-eee/100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamesangus.ucantblamem.com/work/kee-rike-eee/100/</link>
	<description>Hi, I'm James Angus. I have a greed for learning, an obsession with all things web; I am in love with standards, accessibility, creating things for use by people and yes, this site was designed on a mac.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://jamesangus.ucantblamem.com/work/kee-rike-eee/100/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesangus.ucantblamem.com/work/kee-rike-eee/100/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I am amazed I never stumbled across this but I can see just how badly this will affect some commercial developers out there that have built a heap of great components for Joomla (Phil Taylor and Mosets [of which we bought a coponent from]) that have really extended its functionality.

However it does make me feel a bit happier as about a year ago I made the decision to go along and build our own CMS - the main reason being the way Joomla! outputs its XHTML/HTML code. We are actually currently just finishing a big revamp of our CMS (V 2.0) and now its good to know that it hasn't all gone to waste as if we pursued anything further building components in Joomla! rather then our own CMS we would have been stopped in our tracks by this news.

And bring on the screenshots of those UI anyways :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed I never stumbled across this but I can see just how badly this will affect some commercial developers out there that have built a heap of great components for Joomla (Phil Taylor and Mosets [of which we bought a coponent from]) that have really extended its functionality.</p>
<p>However it does make me feel a bit happier as about a year ago I made the decision to go along and build our own CMS - the main reason being the way Joomla! outputs its XHTML/HTML code. We are actually currently just finishing a big revamp of our CMS (V 2.0) and now its good to know that it hasn&#8217;t all gone to waste as if we pursued anything further building components in Joomla! rather then our own CMS we would have been stopped in our tracks by this news.</p>
<p>And bring on the screenshots of those UI anyways :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko</title>
		<link>http://jamesangus.ucantblamem.com/work/kee-rike-eee/100/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamesangus.ucantblamem.com/work/kee-rike-eee/100/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>One thing in additional that those laywers from FSF (James Vasile) wrote the "rider", so maybe he doesn't know what he was doing last year, but now he knows, or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing in additional that those laywers from FSF (James Vasile) wrote the &#8220;rider&#8221;, so maybe he doesn&#8217;t know what he was doing last year, but now he knows, or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
